Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Death of PJ, revisited
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:42:58 -0500
References: <C6B8DF43.53719%mark@rabinergroup.com>

For clarity:
I do agree with you that the photographic print
holds the true secret to the beauty of the medium.

However, this discussion began with
the state of photo journalism;
which historically meant newspapers, magazines,
and the occasional book
(none of which reproduce the beauty of a silver print).

The best photo journalism, today,
is mostly accessed through computers.

The beauty of fine photographic prints
requires trips to museums and galleries
(or visits to friends who print);
and represents a whole different market
than photo journalism.

While a very few photo journalists
and documentary photographers
also find an "art print" market;
it remains rare occurrence.

This is the state-of-our-art.

So brain storming
how to make this, current state, work
remains the challenge.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:22 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>> Yet you show us your paying gig
>> as a slide show / interview
>>
>> how many hits do those NYT show receive?
>>
>> How many "prints" did you sell last month?
>
>
> Yes exactly the point.
>
> People do see stuff on the internet more than they're ever going to  
> see your
> prints.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)