Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:02:07 -0500
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E9735@case-email.casefoods.com> <FF5E4D2F9E266E876969BD2A@rutabook.waverley.reid.org>
 
K3 Inks, the new Edwal Ultra Black.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Reid" <reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed


> That depends, it seems to me, on whether or not you have some developer 
> and fixer.
>
>> I don't know which presents a more daunting task; a directory filled
>> with 4,000 yet to be processed RAW files, or 5 undeveloped rolls of
>> FP4+.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed)