Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The new m9 and I
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:07:54 -0400

> Frank Filippone wrote:
> 
>> The real problem with any camera is that you need a backup, just in 
>> case...
>> and that means $16K... or digital primary and film secondary, which may be
>> the best way for me....
> 
> That was my theory too.  As it turned out (in my case) the film backup was 
> not
> necessary.  I do have a digital backup now, purchased used for much less 
> than
> the initial new cost - just in case the kayak turns into a submarine.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


My 2 cents...
People on this list are always talking about a film backup for their digital
camera. I'm sure because they already have the film camera. To me this does
not make it a viable backup.
It's an apple backup for an orange.

Its "another camera" they you are bringing alone in case this main one
breaks.
But in a good sense can use the same lenses.


Mark William Rabiner





Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] The new m9 and I)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] The new m9 and I)