Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:17:56 -0700
References: <36172e5a0908131425uac7d343ra6e61ab2e399c8d@mail.gmail.com> <C6AA780B.52D8A%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Reality check, reality check!!!

I print plenty.

and I have both of these 1.3x crop and "teeny" sensor E-3.

Have you shot M8 at ISO 1250?

This is not one of the areas that the M8 wins.


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Mark Rabiner<mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

>
> Are we talking about a 2x crop 4/3s camera getting better results than a 
> 1.3
> crop Leica M8 really?
>
> Its the kind of thinking that might come out of never making a print.
>
> Or shooting above iso 400.
>
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)