Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: stasys1 at cox.net (stasys1 at cox.net)
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:23:03 -0700
 
Jerry- I saw a Carrera Speedster at a shop/sales operation Saturday- I think 
it is probably north of $150K. Stasys
---- Jerry Lehrer <glehrer at san.rr.com> wrote: 
> LUGers,
> 
> The word is "inevitable"!  Isn't it? 
> 
> It is not sensor size, or even pixel mega-size.  It is how low angle 
> rays are handled.  A
> little progress here; a bit more progress there (from Leica and Kodak)  
> Et voila!  A full
> frame digii-M.
> 
> I do remember when $8000 would buy TWO brand new Porsches.  Yes, in 1955 
> the
> Porsche 1600 Normal Speedsters were $3000 each!
> 
> Jerry
> 
> 
> Steve Unsworth wrote:
> > Given the third world nature of the dollar it probably is <grin>.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> > On 10/8/09 22:40, "Richard Man" <richard.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> with Leica? $8000 sounds almost like a good deal!!!
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> > _
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
 In reply to: Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)