Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Critical thinking should be left to the men of best quality. No need to trouble people with images that may be disturbing...unless it's disturbing news about a celeb. Walter had passed, the standard is gone. At 11:29 AM 8/10/2009, you wrote: >I'm not sure that rejuvenation of the old paradigm is likely. > >The opportunity rests in discovering >and developing within the new paradigm >of internet delivery of photo journalism >which people may (or may not) >value more than their cell phone photos and videos. > >The most disturbing part of this question >is the alleged and extreme interest in celebrity photos >over issues photos. > >Regards, >George Lottermoser >george at imagist.com >http://www.imagist.com >http://www.imagist.com/blog >http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > >On Aug 9, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > >>from NYT... >> >>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/10/business/media/10photo.html?_r=1 >> >> >>does anyone see an opportunity for rejuvenation? >> >> >>Steve >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information