Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark: APS-C vs. 4/3, not 35mm vs. 4/3. Read what I wrote. Everything is a trade-off. Before you can finish saying D3 ISO 256000 20x24" print, I can say much less $$, more DoF, less strained arms. Before you can say less noise at high ISO, I can say smaller lens, image stabilized body. Horses for courses. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Mark Rabiner<mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > I don't think with all the remotely serious photography being done on > larger > and larger sensors and Leica forgoing 4/3s according to Geoff's report > because of the sensor size not being big enough that wanting to move up in > sensor size and not down is not silly on my part. > -- // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com // w: http://www.rfman.com blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963