Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:31 AM 6/29/2009, you wrote: >Geoff, I see several areas where MP/M7 wins over M8: > >- the smell of fixer in the morning >- tri-x >- Antarctica >- 15 is 15 >- 1 roll tri-x + developing = $5. $3000 premium is 600 rolls of tri-x. >- analog prints command a higher premium >- 10 years later, your film M still works with the latest film. Those are all killers for me. Killers of the film version of Leica!! I've been lucky enough to be able to keep several M6's and M7's along with my M8's. I took the M7's on my last couple of trips, just in case. Still haven't developed the film. I cannot see any circumstance under which the M7 or M6s would be better FOR ME. Digital is superior to film in ever way FOR ME. That's just me. I'm done with smelling developer and fixer. I'm not convinced that there will be any "latest film". Digital is far cheaper than film in every way. My digital prints and files sell just as well as film prints and they are much easier to market. Nobody has ever asked whether they are digital or film. YMMV! Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com