Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: American Styling
From: jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:25:58 -0400
References: <0F599471-0A42-4A07-8E6E-0D874ADB730C@embarqmail.com> <4A416BF9.20208@san.rr.com> <867895EB-A2D3-4A8A-BB6A-3B2D75CBF46B@embarqmail.com>

There are many things that helped to kill the US auto industry, well above
the styling excess of 50s and 60s cars.

Corporate Arrogance would head my list, beginning with lackluster to
dreadful quality control.  The prevailing feeling in the 50s and 60s was
that customers would trade in their cars every two or three years, so why
build a car that would endure?  One former Ford executive who, when I asked
about the metal parts of early Mustangs that were not galvanized or painted,
said, "these cars were built to last as long as the payment book."  Consumer
Reports recently discussed the relative quality of the US automakers
product, which still fell short of many of their competitors' models.  GM
was considered not bad, Ford was considered better, and Chrysler still
abysmal.  Given this, would you put your money on "not bad", when for the
same money or less you could own "excellent"?

Next would be tone-deafness to consumer preferences about auto size,
mileage, and safety features. For every excuse that Detroit offered, a
foreign competitor would answer with a product that offered size,
efficiency, and safety that exceeded customer expectations.

Then would come internal inertia, where the organizations were more focused
on their corporate needs than the customer's demands.   Those of us who
remember the awful generic GM autos of the 80s can attest to the problems of
putting "badge engineering" above customer demand for cars differentiated by
both style and engineering.  Cadillac Cimarron, anyone?  Or the Opel-derived
Catera?

Finally would come the myopia of executive leadership of the past
thirty-plus years, which believed that their successors would fix the
problems they avoided.  Alfred Sloan predicted in the late 1940s that a GM
defined-benefit pension plan would eventually bring the company to financial
ruin.  When GM owned 50% of the US car market, it was less of a concern--but
as market share declined (and as retirees lived longer than their parents or
grandparents) it became a huge problem. 

Jim Shulman
Wynnewood, PA
Who is still waiting for his '57 Dodge to come out of the repair shop.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Ric
Carter
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:06 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: American Styling

I'm a child of the '50s and '60s

I LOVE excess;^)

ric


On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:

>
> If you are trying to show us some of the excesses that helped to  
> kill the American auto industry, you
> are succeeding!


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)
In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: American Styling)