Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Which is a polite way of saying that the lens is a dog...every lens is decent at f8. I used to have one and really tried to like it, but to no avail. The 3.4/135mm Apo Telyt, on the other hand, is a revelation. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Michiel Fokkema wrote: > Useless, because both camera's don't have the frame lines for 135mm. > But you can use them with an axillary finder in the flash shoe. > When closed down to f8 or so, the quality is not bad. > > > Cheers, > > Michiel Fokkema > > Gary Dalton wrote: >> I am wondering what your individual opinions are with respect to >> the quality and usefulness of the 135 Hektor f4.5 lens on an M2? >> What about on an M8? >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Hotmail? has ever-growing storage! Don?t worry about storage limits. >> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009 >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: >> 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 06:54:00 > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information