Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:53:04 +0800
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95D0@case-email.casefoods.com> <8D441F08-A3C2-4399-9072-23E0DDF3C858@cox.net> <p0623090ac64a26cf9ee9@10.0.1.199> <8BFF4EFE-F7E1-4804-B0F3-B25ED454FE3B@cox.net> <36172e5a0906012232n225ff0acg55dd249ae410ca0e@mail.gmail.com> <4A24C410.4030905@sfr.fr> <A197E35B-97C1-493A-A4D6-FDD78869CAB8@cox.net> <36172e5a0906020941r257709cch4f705c3956cc3951@mail.gmail.com> <D73E99D6-2BDF-4FFF-B586-C60D77E4B757@cox.net>

I don't mean to sound arrogant, but in today's AF digital age, I  
don't think it's unreasonable to try for both. At least, I do when I  
shoot street... :)



On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>
>> Absolutely fascinating gentlemen that we could look at this so  
>> differently.
>> Looking at the HCB images I have, I see a number that I can  
>> recognise as
>> iconic and superb, yet others that I understand not at all.  
>> Throughout I see
>> images that have succeeded despite the technical shortcomings  
>> rather than
>> because of them.  Perhaps an insight as to why his work is famous  
>> and mine
>> never will be. Still I make mine for me which is of course their  
>> purpose.
>>
>> For all of that I'd much rather have my photo time machine in the  
>> service of
>> Ansel Adams. Actually I just remembered that HCB in fact decried  
>> Ansel's
>> preoccupation with rocks rather than the human condition. Maybe I  
>> need to
>> switch to an 11 x14 field camera or something to pursue my Grail.
>
>
> this is a terribly interesting discussion Geoff, and the points you  
> mention, really get me thinking further about something I already  
> deeply believe,
>
> the quest for technical excellence above spontaneity and content  
> would certainly force me to consider large format, super large  
> negatives, or whatever  :-)  , as well as a tripod...
>
> striving for that level of pure technical excellence, would not  
> have me using a hand held camera with a cropped sensor, designed  
> for quick and discrete street shooting, capturing spontaneity...
>
> as I see it, these are  two quite different goals, the  
> accomplishment of each one being very difficult, and the where  
> withall to do each, at cross purposes...
>
>
> best,
>
> bon voyage, Steve
>
>
>>
>> 2009/6/3 Steve Barbour <kididdoc at cox.net>
>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Philippe Amard wrote:
>>>
>>> Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <> HCB photographs. Same scenario, would any of
>>>>> his photographs have been worse or better with modern M glass and
>>>>> exposure
>>>>> metering?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could have spoiled the whole thing Geoff, it might at least.
>>>>
>>>> I was at this HCB exhibition in Paris last Thursday.
>>>> Lots of prints, each a masterpiece.
>>>> Yet, some are on the verge of fuzzy, some are not that sharp,  
>>>> soft in some
>>>> cases to modern standards at least,
>>>> the sea isn't even always level, etc.
>>>> Technicalities doesn't seem to have been his concern at all...
>>>>
>>>
>>> hopefully his eye would have survived modern lenses....
>>>
>>> evidently he felt that sharp lenses make dull photographs...
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm cautious here as I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> Only, each one of these 50 or 80 photographs has character.
>>>> It doesn't pop at you, you just seamlessly sink into them.
>>>> I'd bet he used the cam as he knew it could work.
>>>> I think it's all that is to say about the gear.
>>>>
>>>> And when there, you don't need to know you're there to know who  
>>>> was behind
>>>> the camera, whatever the camera.
>>>> That is a question you don't even ask.
>>>> Opportunity, light, geometry, every thing tells you the camera  
>>>> was just a
>>>> tool he used to convey his vision.
>>>>
>>>> Yet, his tireur(s) should also receive more credits. As many  
>>>> Wows as there
>>>> are rints exposed.
>>>>
>>>> My two Pfennig of Saukraut ;-)
>>>> Have fun in (sunny?) Berlin my friend.
>>>> Best from Metz
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> 'Life's not B&W, except at both ends'
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Salgado in Sunday NY Times)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)