Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 Sharpening filter use - was: full sized samples
From: mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:26:38 +0800
References: <C648D5D3.4F4BD%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Pick the camera, pick the most aesthetically pleasing, whatever. It  
doesn't matter. Point is that even in the final print, if you do it  
right you can't tell how you got there in the first place if I didn't  
tell you.

On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> What are they going for when they pick? Pick what?
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>> From: Thein Onn Ming <mingthein at gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:23:36 +0800
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 Sharpening filter use - was: full sized  
>> samples
>>
>> FWIW, I find printing a lot more forgiving than the screen. You can
>> make really nice prints with even a mid-range P&S and decent light
>> plus some basic postprocessing knowledge. (Heracy, I know). I have to
>> admit I've tried this test a number of times - mix up a load of 8x12s
>> or 12x18s shot with different cameras and formats, and get the viewer
>> to pick. Most of the time they pick wrong. The only dead giveaways
>> are superwides and superteles.
>>
>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

THEIN Onn Ming
*photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
www.flickr.com/mingthein







Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 Sharpening filter use - was: full sized samples)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 Sharpening filter use - was: full sized samples)