Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:24:24 -0500
References: <41C24C1D-9BE1-4FF8-9718-01876E26F4FB@gmail.com>

thanks Ming.
do you recall what ASA you used on the CFV shots?

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On May 28, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Thein Onn Ming wrote:

> For George, Mark and anybody else who might be interested...some  
> full sized files (JPEG, converted from RAW using ACR) from the D3x  
> (with 24-70/2.8 and 105VR micro; arguably two of the best lenses  
> Nikon has today) and Hasselblad CFV 16MP back (with 80/2.8 standard  
> lens).
>
> *CAVEATS*: The CFV was shot handheld, available light except for  
> the landscape shot. I'd use only the landscape to judge quality. We  
> were going to do a studio shoot, but the back kept bricking itself  
> requiring multiple battery-out resets (kinda like the first M8 I  
> used when shooting C mode and discrete advance) but eventually just  
> bricked itself. The D3x was shot entirely handheld, though the  
> watch shot was with studio lighting (aside from photojournalism,  
> watch photography is my other speciality. When I did it  
> commercially I was using a D2H or D200 and the 85/2.8 PC Micro, not  
> MF.)
>
> EXIF data intact but ignore the 'blad data because it doesn't  
> register aperture, and I'm pretty sure the shutter speeds are all  
> wrong. D3x of course tells you everything including the nutritional  
> content of my breakfast of three days prior. Hosting on fickr  
> because I don't have the server bandwidth otherwise.
>
> 'Blad
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3409/3573849245_4776a4c694_o.jpg
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3639/3573842195_769c55cfb0_o.jpg
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3561/3573839191_da9b5f0bf1_o.jpg
>
>
> D3x
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3572/3573831647_f85b31aa81_o.jpg
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3610/3574628948_2e7197f2ff_o.jpg
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3589/3574623624_70e7d3ae08_o.jpg
>
> Note the fine texture resolved by the D3x in the lady's top.
>
>
> For some odd reason, looking at the images again, the 'blad output  
> reminds me a lot of the M8. Maybe it's the highlight tone bias and  
> lack of AA filter.
>
> Ming
>
> THEIN Onn Ming
> *photohorologer ming at www.mingthein.com
> www.flickr.com/mingthein
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
In reply to: Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)