Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I just wonder if taking stabs like this at all this various software to do the same thing is the way to do it but not to just spend some real time with one; like a week; namely the one which comes with your version of Photoshop and I bet the HDR in CS4 is awesome and its results are hanging successfully on all kind of walls. I don't think its all bout whose default settings come to closet to what we want. But mastering one piece of software and that just takes some real time; in real-time. Mark William Rabiner > From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:10:45 -0400 > To: <digitalusersgroup at yahoogroups.com>, <lug at leica-users.org>, > <paw at micapeak.com>, <seephoto at micapeak.com> > Subject: [Leica] IMG: HDR? PhotoMatix > > PESO: > > I think the vote is against Lucis Pro. ;-) How about PhotoMatix? > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/110869330 > > It takes longer to process than Lucis but looks more natural. It may > soften instead of sharpening, though? Plus, I used the default > settings on PhotoMatix. Lucis I pushed quite a bit. > > TIA > > Tina > > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information