Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]much as i hate to admit it, i've been exclusively m8 since i got it, the black-paint MP, and the m6 classic 0.85 are laying the their respective lowepro pockets. that being said, on the M8, a 28 is about 35, a 35 is about 50, and a 21 is about 28. so the voigtlander 28 on the m8 is about a 35mm. -rei On Mar30 02:07, Mark Rabiner wrote: > When shooting an event if my 35 went out leaving me only with a 28 I'd just > go home. > People just don't appreatate being turned into little midgets with a 28 > They ask for their money back > But a 35 you get a break and you can do it. > > The 35 with a Hassy or 6x6 is a 60 > A 28 is a 50 > Nominally not exactly. > > You get a ton more mileage out of a 60. > > On a 35mm camera I call a 35 the "bring home the shot" lens. > You can do most things with just that one lens and leave all your other > glass at home. > A 28 is an extreme effect. > Less so with a Leica M lens which seems much more well corrected for > distortion than the run of the mill glass for the mass. > If you shoot people it has to be from the waist up or they are made into > dwarves. Dwarves are very nice people too of course. They don't want to be > made to look much smaller than they really are either. > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > From: Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:22:01 -0700 > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] VoigVoigtlander 28mm Question > > > > I'm glad you put that lens onto good use. I could never get used to it. I > > guess one problem is when you have the 35/1.4 ASPH, the 28/1.9 is a bit > > close in terms of FOV... > > > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Rei Shinozuka <shino at panix.com> > > wrote: > > > >> nothing in particular, just adding a few data points via images for the > >> benefit of the original questioner regarding this lens in casual use. i > >> pretty much concur with your opinion, but for $300 i am not complaining! > >> > >> > > -- > > // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com > > // w: http://www.rfman.com > > // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Rei Shinozuka shino at panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey