Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you Larry, but the lens was not a wide angle, it was a small tele 8,5 cm. Saludos cordiales Lluis El 22/03/2009, a las 23:09, Lawrence Zeitlin escribi?: > I may be in the minority here, but the slightly darker areas outside > of the central area look to me like normal falloff expected of a > wide angle lens. When you use the lens on the M8 you are only using > the central portion of the image circle. And if the lens is coded, > the M8 software compensates for the small amount of falloff. Changes > in brightness across the field are not always due to lens defects. > Some are due to geometry. > > Larry Z > > > On Mar 22, 2009, at 5:18 PM, lug-request at leica-users.org wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote: >> >>> I've tested the lens on the M3 with TX at 400 ISO, I was veru >>> surprised to appreciate a certain flare on the center of the >>> negative, aybe it was simply that lens was dirty, the lens has no >>> signs of coating deterioration at all, maybe is a slight reflection >>> of light due to the adaptor adjustement on the camera, the case is >>> that the first picture could be in my opinion a good catch but I've >>> can improve it, I would like know your opinions, thanks in advance. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information