Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The main difference: The Leica C-LUX 3 is gorgeous and the Panasonic Lumix FX37 is ugly. I don't know about you but all I care about is my cameras image. Not the one it makes. Sometimes I'll pay extra to not have an ugly silver camera but a gorgeous black one with a red dot. Really! The software is proably a bit better on the Leica its a good excuse. I LOVE the C-LUX 3 and 4. The 16/9 format rules as does its ant vibration so you can shoot at 100 and really get shots which will blow up past letter sized. Maybe. Mark William Rabiner > From: Susan Rennie <rennies at earthlink.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:51:44 -0800 > To: <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Leica C-Lux3 or Panasonic FX37? > > Dear Leica Listas, > > I would very much appreciate input as to the differences between the > Leica C-LUX 3 and the Panasonic Lumix FX37 (except the substantial > price difference). > > I was a dedicated Leica (M4) until I made the digital switch (Nikon > D200 and D300). I'm very happy with the Nikons, but I really need a > small pocket camera as I like to have a camera with me at all times - > which was easier with the M4 than it is with the Nikons. (The M8 is > out of my price range.) > > Thank you very much, > > Susan > > -- > Susan Rennie > 310.301.6071 (CA) > 503.392.9023 (OR) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information