Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LTM versus M
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed Feb 18 16:03:06 2009
References: <200902170300.n1H30IaS007669@server1.waverley.reid.org><7875AF61-89CE-4F46-B685-BFE10DE1B82D@optonline.net><36172e5a0902162241h19c3de47h7b79ac76190bf796@mail.gmail.com><8D555D84-5209-44D9-B16F-FA733180E6E6@teleport.com><36172e5a0902170003oee34f08rbf6cce8f36127102@mail.gmail.com><499A8B7A.9080904@gmx.de><584FA2308FEB4DC3B8CB62C87B4BBC61@precisionm50><20090217205730.D927E15B316@barracuda.rutabaga.org><CB127951-6625-46C5-B79F-CCEF8D13DBE3@embarqmail.com><DD0DDA33F4AC48858A442D8DCF28D338@jimnichols> <E7B6A62C-E4A8-4640-81DF-1DF23EDCECFE@embarqmail.com>

Ric,

That must be frustrating.  I seems to always appear in the same corner of 
the frame, which would be the upper right corner of the film as it exists in 
the camera.  In looking at my IIIf, the only source near there is the screw 
hole in the top plate, behind the shutter speed dial.  Are you shooting 
without a screw-on ring around the shutter release? A leak in that area 
might also appear as this leak does. I would apply black tape to anything 
around that part of the top plate that doesn't have to move, and see if the 
source can be located.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ric Carter" <ricc@embarqmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LTM versus M


> On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:13 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Let us know if the light leak has been cured.
>
>
> Hell, no, it's not cured!
>
> This IIIf is retired I guess, as much as I like the handling.
>
> Did the CLA thing locally, took it back for light leak a couple of  times. 
> He insisted it was fixed, only showing "reflections from inside  the 
> lens."
>
> Then sent it to big-name repair for another CLA and repair of light  leak. 
> Came back still leaking light (but with a much brighter  viewfinder). Sent 
> it back. It stayed for almost two years. Changed  baffles. Got it back 
> Monday.
>
> Ran a roll through yesterday and today at lunch. Still leaking light.
>
> I get this completely uneducated feeling that the shutter has no part  in 
> the leak. Repairer says it's not the lugs... I think I'll put a  short 
> roll in it with a capped lens and no exposures and see if  leaving it in 
> the sun results in exposure.
>
> I had high hopes, but am pretty well beaten now on fixing it.
>
> A trip to yet another repair person, and I could have bought a CL for 
> what I have in fixing a free camera. Hi Ho...
>
> Here are the first 8 frames from the first roll back.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/Grab-Bag/leak/>
> http://tinyurl.com/cebz2j
> It did lay (lens capped) on the seat of the car in full sun for a  while 
> after shooting these frames.
>
> There is milder exposure later in the roll and strongest in the  sprocket 
> margin.
>
> Ideas welcome.
>
> Ric Carter
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from leica at web-options.com (Bob W) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] LTM versus M)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] LTM versus M)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] LTM versus M)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] LTM versus M)