Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Chris,
thanks. It's not easy comparing the focal length equivalents, but I
guess it roughly equates to 65mm on 35mm.
The film was developed in Ilford DDX 1+4 for 9 minutes at 20 degrees C.
The negative was scanned on an Epson V700 at 1200dpi - which gives me a
print of 20 plus inches if I want it. File size is a mere 133MB! (I
scan it as a colour negative then use the channel mixer in PS2 to get
the tonal balance that I want.).
HTH
Mark
Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK
Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
(2008)
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
Christopher Birchenhall wrote:
> Mark
>
> Love it. 210mm lens? How did you develop the film and how did yuo scan it?
>
> Chris B
>
> 2009/2/16 Mark Pope <mark@whitedogs.co.uk>:
>> Taken with my Shen-Hao HZX45II, 21omm Nikkor lens with yellow-green
>> filter,
>> HP5 plus rated at EI400. Exposure was 50 seconds at f32.
>>
>> http://www.monomagic.co.uk/gallery.php?gallery=largeformat&image=amaryillis-210mm.jpg
>>
>> C&C appreciated. Hope you enjoy it.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Pope,
>> Swindon, Wilts
>> UK
>>
>> Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk
>> Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
>> Picture a week (2009)
>> http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
>> (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information