Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, you have voiced what I have thought for a long while, but I would take it further. I do not have nor have I used the new 50/1,4 Summilux-ASPH but it appears optically to be the standard against which all 50mm lenses are measured. The only real benefit of a Noctilux that I can understand and accept is the unusual, even unique, images that that razor-thin DOF offer. For in terms of pure speed I would never accept the weight and bulk penalty of either the f/1 or f/0.95 for the additional stop or stop and a quarter of speed. Especially given the low-light sensitivity of the M8 sensor. my 2c. perhaps I will think differently when I get an M8 and have the use of a Noctilux. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 7:42 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyoneelse - distortion now Nikkor 28/1.4 > The 1.2 Noctilux was much much smaller than the later f 1 which I have. > A Summilux on steroids it seemed to me (when I met one) or a Noctilux left > in the dryer for a very long time after being washed in hot water it > changes > the whole modus operandi reason for being je ne sais quoi of the lens's > reason for being. > And its gorgeous. > unfortunately its rarity is the the first issue. > The copies out there if you bought it from someone and you said you were > going to use it to shoot pix they'd be forced to kill you. It's in their > original buyers contract. > My hopes were with what we now know about optics the next version would > give > me that balance again. > Those hopes were dashed to the ground then they went for even more speed > instead of usability. > Like threes a shot we're not going to get at .95 that we're not going to > get > a f1 or f1.2. > > Give me a compact F1.2 well corrected and balanced and watch it become a > part of the way a lot of very good photographers work every day. > They can still do that. The end of the world is not still at hand. > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > >> From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:14:31 +0000 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone >> else - >> distortion now Nikkor 28/1.4 >> >> The original f1.2 Noctilux and 35 f1.4 aspherical eash had two hand >> ground aspheric surfaces. Apparently the scrap rate, and presumably >> the inspection cost, was horrendous. They made very, very few of each >> apparently. I have a 35 and prefer the look to the later 35mm f1.4 >> asph which has one moulded aspheric surface. I have read that the >> difference in sharpness is minimal. The difference in look is not, >> IMHO. It is my most used lens by far and most of my favourite pictures >> were taken with it. >> Frank >> >> On 8 Feb, 2009, at 05:13, Marty Deveney wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> Why do you suppose Nikon stopped making it? >>> >>> Two reasons: the aspherical element was hand-ground, necessitating a >>> very high manufacturing cost for a prime Nikkor - the lens thus sold >>> slowly and required a large mark-up to recoup design and tooling >>> costs; second one of the high-index glass elements used lead and the >>> laws changed in Japan, making continuing with this impossible. >>> Rather than opt to redesign with a different glass, they >>> discontinued the lens. About 7000 were made. >>> >>> I occasionally think about the extremely skilled worker who ground >>> the aspherical element when I use mine. I'd sure like to know his >>> or her story. >>> >>> It's tremendous in use, but was designed long enough ago (it was >>> introduced in 1993) that technology has moved on. If Nikon decided >>> to redesign it they would have moulded elements, better coatings, >>> newer glass types and a variety of new construction methods at their >>> disposal. Leica are developing new lenses at quite a clip to keep >>> their lenses up with technology - and of course their cameras. >>> >>> Marty > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.19/1939 - Release Date: 02/06/09 17:28:00