Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks all who commented - I've since posted the original and a last version following George's prompt and advice, which I think is better for number 2. thanks again Bien cordialement de Metz Phx Lluis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > Ah malin!, when some minutes ago I've mentionned the Angenieux I > can't imagine this superb picture, the Angenieux lenses have a > superb rendition, I think I've already mentionned that on the 80's > I've tested the 90 Angenieux with the 90 R Summicron, fine details > was better on Angenieux and his contrast was a little more smooth. > > Nevertheless on this set the second is my favorite. > > Concerning the Summicron flare ... I honestly think "tu es trop > ?xigeant mon ami", some little imperfections are beautiful.... > otherwise how you define the "Gamour"? > > Amiti?s > Lluis > > > El 31/01/2009, a las 8:45, Philippe AMARD escribi?: > >> Contre-jours: >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Flare+o+the+cron-1080476.jpg.html >> >> > >> L1 - Summicron 50 - better viewed large >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Botanique-1080474.jpg.html >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Botanique-1080474.jpg.html>> >> >> >> L1 -Summicron 50 - >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151337-1/2009-Canal-Contre-jour-1080531.jpg >> >> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151337-1/2009-Canal-Contre-jour-1080531.jpg>> >> >> >> L1 - Ang?nieux 70 x 3 at 210 - f 22 >> >> Comments and criticism welcome as usual >> Bien cordialement de Metz >> Phxyz >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >