Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: my digital journey (WAS: Nathan's PAW 3: Santa Pola, tapas, and new software)
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon Jan 26 14:27:49 2009
References: <10565E70-32F5-443D-B997-C14A8769E502@frozenlight.eu> <1D868FA3-83A7-44B1-8A6F-9F7CA33F89FA@mac.com> <F90A9847-7232-4541-88B9-1D3FE3EF00FA@frozenlight.eu>

thanks Nathan
seems like your experience and thoughts
are in synch with many of us
who've worked through
a number of systems.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07




On Jan 26, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Hi George,
>
> As always, thanks for looking and for the kind words.
>
> To answer your question: yes, I have used all the equipment you  
> mention. In 2004 I decided to get a DSLR and went to Canon, mainly  
> because I wanted to use my Leica R lenses. But like you have  
> written on several occasions, I quickly found that Leica R lenses  
> work best on a Leica body, and I sold them all except my 100mm Apo  
> Macro which was just too good to let go. After about a year with  
> the 20D I bought a second-hand 1D Mark II and used that as my  
> primary outfit for a couple of years, along with 3-4 L lenses. I  
> liked that the Canon was rugged, weather-proof (tested several  
> times in Amsterdam downpours), but boy did my shoulder hurt after  
> walking around with the bag for a day. I was, however, disappointed  
> with the optical quality of some of the expensive lenses,  
> particularly the 16-35mm. Even on a body with a 1.3 sensor factor  
> it was decidedly soft in corners.
>
> So I began to look at Olympus, attracted by the lighter bodies and  
> lenses and the good reputation enjoyed by Olympus optics. After  
> getting my feet wet with an E-410, I bought an E3 which I still  
> have, along with the 12-60mm and 50-200mm lenses. I was and am very  
> pleased with this DSLR, despite the limitations at high ISO. The  
> lenses were definitely better than their Canon equivalents.
>
> All along I lusted after an M8, and when the right opportunity  
> presented itself in early December, I went for it. I have now shot  
> approximately 1700 images with it, and I could not be more pleased.  
> It did not take me long to re-learn manual focusing, and now my  
> percentage of nailed focus shots is higher than with the AF systems  
> I used before. I can again carry my outfit around all day in my  
> Domke 803 and not have shoulder pain. My primary lens is the 35mm  
> Summarit, a brilliant lens which, aside from a bit of barrel  
> distortion is every bit as good as a Summicron. But the bottom line  
> is image quality. Let me put it this way: with my M8 files, I no  
> longer sharpen my images. It is simply not necessary. I spend much  
> less time processing my RAW files in Lightroom with the M8 than  
> with any of the other cameras I have owned.
>
> Is the M8 perfect? Of course not. I would like better high ISO  
> performance, although I find 1250 entirely satisfactory and far  
> superior to film (but of course Nikon has shown us how good high  
> ISO can be). I would also like some weather-proofing, as befits a  
> camera designed for street photography. And that's about it. Full  
> frame is not a big deal for me, and really the only Olympus feature  
> I sometimes miss is the supersonic dust removal.
>
> Getting the M8 was the best decision (in photography) that I have  
> made in a long time. Should I have done it earlier? Not really. I  
> had long said that once I could buy one at a certain price point, I  
> would do so. That price point was reached in December--around 2500  
> Euros, new, with 2-year UK Passport warranty.
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:29 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking us on another delightful stroll through your  
>> life Nathan.
>> While the seascapes are lovely; I really enjoy the "moments" in  
>> Alt 5 and 8.
>>
>> Also: I can't help wondering if you might provide a report
>> on your feelings regarding the M8.
>> You're one of we who've migrated through Canon, Canon/R glass,
>> (and I believe Olympus-ville) and now use the M8.
>> So you must have thoughts and feelings about these
>> various systems and how they worked or didn't work for you
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george@imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>
>>> This week's images contain some beautiful views of the  
>>> Mediterranean, attractive tapas, and at least one sweaty se?orita:
>>>
>>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws/?page_id=179
>>>
>>> As always, comments and critique are welcome and appreciated.  
>>> There are no pictures from this weekend's storm, those will get a  
>>> separate gallery on my greatpix.eu site, hopefully tonight.
>>>
>>> On a side note, this weekend I upgraded the Wordpress software on  
>>> which my blog runs from version 1.5 (vintage 2006) to the latest  
>>> version 2.7. For the viewer it should not make any difference,  
>>> but it makes administering the site and fighting comment spam  
>>> much easier. So I have a special request to those who usually  
>>> visit my PAW: if the site behaves strangely in any way, please  
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>
>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 3: Santa Pola, tapas, and new software)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 3: Santa Pola, tapas, and new software)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: my digital journey (WAS: Nathan's PAW 3: Santa Pola, tapas, and new software))