Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 23, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Why is it that our longest threads usually deal with issues such as: > is there too much traffic? or acronyms? Or... > > ***Shit *** this should have beeen in the subject line... Steve > , now I just contributed to it :-( > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > >> >> On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Steve Unsworth wrote: >> >>> But if everything OT was marked OT, everything would be marked OT >>> (more or >>> less) >> >> >> depends whether OT mean on or off topic... >> >> >> simplify ! >> >> OT for just the things that are on topic... >> >> >> >> there you go... eh... >> >> >> Steve >>> >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> On 22/1/09 02:05, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> More OT use would help too. If you feel especially >>>> conservative of bandwidth you can even trim your posts as well! >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information