Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu Jan 22 12:26:05 2009

Better then LR or PQ I find UX and O3 to be much better!


Mark William Rabiner



> From: Jim Nichols <jhnichols@lighttube.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:13:04 -0600
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions
> 
> Geoff,
> 
> I tried the trial version of LR when it first came out.  I understand that
> LR2 is better, but, for the level of work that I do, I feel that Elements
> is more my speed.  I have not yet upgraded to Elements 7.0, but, should I 
> do
> that, that is about as far as I want to go.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew@gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions
> 
> 
>> Jim its magic! If you want more power you can look at getting LR or the
>> big
>> one, PS of course. Some people qualify for non-commercial or academic
>> pricing. I would say that LR2 is made for you.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from grdalton at hotmail.com (Gary Dalton) ([Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Learning from Bokeh and Histogram Discussions)