Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] That PanyLeica 14-50/2.8-3.5 OIS lens
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Thu Jan 22 02:07:31 2009
References: <7ac27f4f0901220126r34bdd48eh467c6185130042f6@mail.gmail.com> <49783F61.6080803@tele2.fr> <7ac27f4f0901220156o328e8644w9e4ece77e20ee1b2@mail.gmail.com>

aperture ring requires energy - I'll check with the oly

seconds
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2oo8/2008-PAW-47-Sleeping+Beauty+-+LTE-w-1070603.jpg.html
wrist resting on chair top - but handheld
ph


Richard Man wrote:

>Thanks, I *think* it ought to work on the E, but if you can check, that'd be
>great. Another advantage is actually that since I am shooting IR, I have to
>shoot Manual exposure and having an aperture ring should really help there.
>
>*Seconds*???
>
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Philippe AMARD 
><philippe.amard@tele2.fr>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/
>>
>>click on details so see exifs when you see a photo that looks like a "long"
>>exposure handheld shot (keeping in mind the L1 is a reflex and more prone 
>>to
>>shake than any 'old timer')
>>My best ever is in seconds ...
>>Hope this can help
>>Phx
>>
>>an afterthough: DK if it works on Olys - should have tried on Alice's for
>>so long - if you can wait until the weekend ...
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] That PanyLeica 14-50/2.8-3.5 OIS lens)
In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] That PanyLeica 14-50/2.8-3.5 OIS lens)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] That PanyLeica 14-50/2.8-3.5 OIS lens)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] That PanyLeica 14-50/2.8-3.5 OIS lens)