Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bokeh yes
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:32:27 2009
References: <1062048673.254751232473444566.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu><76D21FAB037149A2BB389C15F4E914A4@jimnichols> <49763C72.3010109@tele2.fr> <95E2E9B0153F48D5B100011A4393BBDC@D1S9FY41>

http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/84020-1/Bokeh-Woogie-w.jpg

Phx



Seth Rosner wrote:

> I simply cannot resist:
>
> If you knew bokeh, like I know bokeh,
>    oh, oh, oh what a gel
>
> -or-
>
> gimme a little bokeh, will you, huh?
>    gimme a little bokeh, will you, huh?
>
> -or-
>
> ya gotta have a lot of bokeh,
>    'cause bokeh means good ............
>
> he's lost it again, gals and guys
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe AMARD" 
> <philippe.amard@tele2.fr>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh yes
>
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> here again I love it - my sort of bokeh - even if the circles are whiter
>> on the outer of the circleagainst accepted definition - probably Mark
>> among many maight not like it as not creamy enough, or at all? - yet it
>> does work for me.
>> Thanks for sharing
>> Amicalement
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>
>>> Alan,
>>>
>>> Expensive lenses are not the only ones that produce nice bokeh.  This
>>> image was made in 1963 with a forgotten SLR, and was found when I was
>>> scanning negatives from my collection of cigar boxes.  It was probably
>>> a Petri or an early Contax model.
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Cigar+Box/Donna+_amp_+Tommy+63+sm.jpg.html
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Nichols
>>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Magayne-Roshak" <amr3@uwm.edu>
>>> To: "lug" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:44 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh yes
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 Douglas Nygren <dnygr@cshore.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Bokeh has caught my fancy of late.
>>>>> I'm sure this has been discussed and that there is a diversity of
>>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'd be interested in learnng which lenses you all feel have the best
>>>>> bokeh and why, of course.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Best--Doug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =============================================================================
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.10/1904 - Release Date: 
> 1/20/2009 7:49 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from bjq1 at mac.com (Barney Quinn) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)
Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)
In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)