Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with others who say that these are sincere and honest portraits. I don't think at all that the photographer was trying to create negative perceptions. However, when I saw these the other day on Mike Johnston's blog, "The Online Photographer", I had and immediate and visceral negative reaction. I think the photographer was trying to employ a particular style through the use of the plain background and the ringlight. While this might work for a Vogue model, with this group of middle-aged and older folks its extremely unflattering. What is trying to be art comes off as gimmicky artifice. Maybe its just that I'm not open to new visual ideas although it seems like I'm in good company here. Mike D Brian Reid wrote: > The New York Times magazine just ran a set of portraits of "Obama's > People" > > > http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/magazine/2009-inauguration-gallery/index.html > > > > It feels to me as though the photographer went out of his way to make > all of his subjects look unnatural and bizarre. They are posed > awkwardly, the lighting is very peculiar, the camera angles are > unusual, and the subjects were usually photographed off-guard. > > What does anybody else think? Was the photographer here trying to > create a negative perception of these people? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >