Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Geoff, That is a very good illustration. I have been doing some experimenting myself after I blew the highlights in a cat photo last week. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 5:58 PM Subject: RE: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure > Ted this is an unusual situation clearly but you can see that it can work. > This was with M8 set to + .66. There was no clipping in the Raw file all. > The camera preview did show some clipping. The outside white canvas is a > useful comparison. I wanted snow that was white but with no loss of detail > there. Printed large this has magnificent subtle highlight tones. > Anyone can save the photos and look at the EXIF and histograms if they > wish. > First a straight conversion from the DNG to show how the highlights were > captured. > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/usa/e/h/As+shot.jpg.html> > Second the final image. > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/usa/e/h/Developed+for+highlights.jpg. > html> > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ > Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can. > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure > > > > Lee offered: >> Seth recommended, therefore, setting the exposure compensation in most > cameras to +1/3 or +2/3 of a stop. I have used this with all my Canons and > Leica's (digital) with good results.<<<<<<<< > > Gene responded: >>>Interesting, as I have found that using +1/3 to +2/3 EV blows out the > highlights tremendously with my M8, whereas using -1/3 to -2/3 EV provides > more information to work with. <<<< > > Hi Gene & Lee, > I'm the first to admit I'm not a technical whiz about all this stuff by > long > shot. However after my discussions with Tina and she showing me exposure > adjustments at the Leica Seminar in Rockport it sure opened my eyes to > these > adjustments. > > +1/3 & +2/3 wow! > > Lee I have to question what you are saying about +1/3 or +2/3 over > exposure? > Is there a wild possibility you might have this reversed? If I were to do > this I'd lose frame after frame blown out! I just tried it with my M8 and > a > Canon and it blew everything to hell and back! Like stuff was almost > completely washed out all over the place. > > When I returned them to my normal shooting settings.. -1/3 & -2/3 BINGO! > Right back to as perfect as I like them to look and capture information. > And > they print beautifully withal the stuff there I want to see. > > So is it possible there is an error or misunderstanding in using + or - ? > > Over to you guys, > > > > ted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >