Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun Jan 18 19:40:27 2009
References: <011820091934.27334.49738457000E3D0000006AC6223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com><796o8r$2uksik@pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca> <191A17605B3F4A77A953AD2D5E756403@dadquad>

Geoff,

That is a very good illustration.  I have been doing some experimenting 
myself after I blew the highlights in a cat photo last week.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure


> Ted this is an unusual situation clearly but you can see that it can work.
> This was with M8 set to + .66. There was no clipping in the Raw file all.
> The camera preview did show some clipping. The outside white canvas is a
> useful comparison. I wanted snow that was white but with no loss of detail
> there. Printed large this has magnificent subtle highlight tones.
> Anyone can save the photos and look at the EXIF and histograms if they 
> wish.
> First a straight conversion from the DNG to show how the highlights were
> captured.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/usa/e/h/As+shot.jpg.html>
> Second the final image.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/usa/e/h/Developed+for+highlights.jpg.
> html>
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Question about M8 exposure
>
>
>
> Lee offered:
>> Seth recommended, therefore, setting the exposure compensation in most
> cameras to +1/3 or +2/3 of a stop. I have used this with all my Canons and
> Leica's (digital) with good results.<<<<<<<<
>
> Gene responded:
>>>Interesting, as I have found that using +1/3 to +2/3 EV blows out the
> highlights tremendously with my M8, whereas using -1/3 to -2/3 EV provides
> more information to work with. <<<<
>
> Hi Gene & Lee,
> I'm the first to admit I'm not a technical whiz about all this stuff by 
> long
> shot. However after my discussions with Tina and she showing me exposure
> adjustments at the Leica Seminar in Rockport it sure opened my eyes to 
> these
> adjustments.
>
> +1/3 & +2/3 wow!
>
> Lee I have to question what you are saying about +1/3 or +2/3 over 
> exposure?
> Is there a wild possibility you might have this reversed? If I were to do
> this I'd lose frame after frame blown out! I just tried it with my M8 and 
> a
> Canon and it blew everything to hell and back! Like stuff was almost
> completely washed out all over the place.
>
> When I returned them to my normal shooting settings.. -1/3 & -2/3 BINGO!
> Right back to as perfect as I like them to look and capture information. 
> And
> they print beautifully withal the stuff there I want to see.
>
> So is it possible there is an error or misunderstanding in using + or - ?
>
> Over to you guys,
>
>
>
> ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 



In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Question about M8 exposure)