Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think they're fascinating. If you compare the style to the usual type of portrait of senior politicians, which are typically shot in the heroic mode, I think you have something which tries to be rather more honest. They're not in all cases flattering - some of them look like your worst nightmare passport photo - but it looks as though the people are at least trying to present themselves honestly. This in itself may be spin, of course. They look a little bit like freshmen, which in a sense they are. It will be interesting to see how they all look in 4 years. Bob > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of Brian Reid > Sent: 18 January 2009 19:57 > To: LUG@leica-users.org > Subject: [Leica] Dehumanizing portraits? > > The New York Times magazine just ran a set of portraits of > "Obama's People" > > > http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/magazine/2009-inauguratio > n-gallery/index.html > > It feels to me as though the photographer went out of his way > to make all of his subjects look unnatural and bizarre. They > are posed awkwardly, the lighting is very peculiar, the > camera angles are unusual, and the subjects were usually > photographed off-guard. > > What does anybody else think? Was the photographer here > trying to create a negative perception of these people? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >