Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 17, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote: > Steve Barbour wrote: > >> Phxy had written >> >>> I developed a batch from my trip to Paris both on the PC using LR >>> 1.3 or 4 , and on the Imac using LR and can't figure out which is >>> the correct version for the 'mean/median' internet user. >>> Look at the roof there : >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/ >>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/PAW-2009/> >> >> >> one is a lot brighter (the second) than the other ...but what is >> it supposed to look like? Was it 7 am or 11 am? > > > 09.00 CET, i.e. more or less sunrise. > the first one was developed on the PC (LR1.3) - looks greyish when > seen on the Mac > the second one developed on the IMac using LR2 - looks too metallic > when seen on the PC > > When I see either on the other machine's screen I say 'merde s'il > vous pla?t' , cf the qualms shared by Tina apparently. I suspect the first is more real, though subdued, especially real under the customary early Paris sky.. the second seems too artificially bright, Steve > > > Thanks for input, insights, suggestions > Phxyz > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information