Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Couldn't agree with you more on this! The very fact that he was instrumental in the development of PN55 at Polaroid attests to the possibility. I mean, who took Polaroid as a serious, and relevant, product at the time? sd On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:30 PM, TCB wrote: > AA had a deep, almost sensual understanding of all of the > technology involved in > making an image. I can't imagine he would be resistant to any newer > tech > available today, though I also can't imagine he'd be locked into > any kind of pure > digital rig. > > On Mon 12/01/09 11:05 PM , Nathan Wajsman photo@frozenlight.eu sent: >> I am certain he would. In his autobiography, written shortly before >> his death in 1984, he comments on the then revolutionary notion of >> digital photography and makes some very positive statements about >> what >> he imagines will be its possibilities. I cannot find the exact >> reference at the moment, but it is in there. >> >> Nathan >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.euhttp://www.greatpix.euhttp:// >> www.nathanfoto.com >> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&am >> p;y=0PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/pawsBlog: > http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog >> >> >> On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:18 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >> >>> >>> I believe that if AA was with us today, he would >> be an avid > enthusiast for >>> Photoshop as his darkroom. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >> information >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information