Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Developing B&W for scanning
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Mon Jan 12 17:28:02 2009

I would say the Kodak C41 B&W (Portra) is the best I've tried (assuming you
are interested in 35mm), if you can find a decent lab.  It scans very well,
and ice works.  It is, however, not "archival", but then, if you scan the
images you want, that hopefully is not an issue.  I hope.  I have found that
with patience most b&w films can be scanned, even pyro (I have a lot of pmk
and rollo).  These are pretty dense, as intended for the process, and a less
dense neg would be preferred for scanning.  Hope this helps and I'm glad
it's just downloading from chips now...a good scan takes a long time.....

Ken  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Alastair Firkin
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 6:00 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Developing B&W for scanning
> 
> I was interested in the new Ektar film Kodak released. Its supposed to
> have been developed for scanning!!. Using the c41 b/w films is another
> option. Silver film has "disadvantages" with most scanning (no ice etc).
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --- amr3@uwm.edu wrote:
> 
> From: Alan Magayne-Roshak <amr3@uwm.edu>
> To: lug <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Developing B&W for scanning
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:52:31 -0600 (CST)
> 
> 
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Thomas Irving wrote:
> 
> > Has anyone any advice for exposing & developing B&W for scanning (as
> > opposed to enlarging?).  I've seen oblique references to wanting to
> > do things a bit differently for scanning. Any film/developer
> > combinations people were particularly pleased with would also be
> > useful to know.
> ===============================================================
> I haven't investigated processing specifically for scanning.  I've been
> just going along
> as I did before.  My combinations include (using distilled water to mix
> all developers and
> Photo-Flo):
> 
> Agfa APX 25 in Rodinal 1:25 or 1:50, depending on the contrast of the
> scene;
> 
> Tri-X or HP5 in FG-7 1:15 when rated at 400/500 ISO;
> 
> Or FG-7 1:15 with a 9% solution of sodium sulfite, for a rating of 800
> ISO;
> 
> FP4 in FG-7 1:15;
> 
> FP4 in Microdol-X straight;
> 
> Verichrome Pan in FG-7 1:15 or Microdol-X straight;
> 
> Kodak HIE infrared in FG7 1:15
> 
> My times at 68F vary; I develop by inspection - when the density looks
> right under
> the green light, I put it in the fixer. You can check out my gallery and
> decide for yourself
> if my scanned negs look good.
> 
> Alan
> 
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> UPAA POY 1978
> University Information Technology Services
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Developing B&W for scanning)