Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes indeed, there is something to be 'concerned' - not worried - about, Pasvorn. What you want to give the ad agency is: "for the consideration [the legal term for the money they are paying you] of $x.xx a one-time, non-exclusive license to use........." and then have the agreement state the specific publication use. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pasvorn Boonmark" <pasvorn@boonmark.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:54 PM Subject: [Leica] Stock photo licensing >I got an e-mail today from an Ad Agency in Seattle. > They would like to use one of the photo that I have on Flickr. > > They actually want to pay for it, too. I was a bit surprised. > > I think the term that they use is "unlimited use, royalty free licensing". > > Obviously this is the first for me. Is there anything I should > concern, worry about? > > Thanks, > > -Pasvorn > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1884 - Release Date: 1/9/2009 8:38 AM