Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Aperture 2
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sun Jan 4 20:44:45 2009
References: <9125343.1231012445825.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <55BBF9BE-6C29-4A71-A658-B53A955FEF8E@comcast.net> <010520090406.11064.496187550005507500002B38223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>
 
I have both. I want the Aperture UI with the functionality of
Lightroom. Aperture does too many things behind my back (like many
Apple applications except for, say, Final Cut Pro). Lightroom gives me
lots of control but the GUI just isn't as good as Aperture's.

Adam

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:06 PM,  <grduprey@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone tried Aperture 2 editor?  I am looking for comments both pro 
> and con, or if you have compared it to Light Room.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gene
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from gwpics at googlemail.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Aperture 2)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] And so it begins...)
Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (rsphoto's email) ([Leica] Was "And so it begins" now Mac and Leica philosphy)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Aperture 2)