Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd like to participate. I'd also like to express a different viewpoint regarding the requirements: I think we should *not* restrict ourselves to 100% Leica, just that either a Leica lens or body be used in taking the picture. Just as we did with FOM2. Here's why: 1. Unless all pictures must be taken specifically for the project, we may not remember exactly what lens was used on what body when. I almost always use Leica bodies, but my lens kit is "ethnically" mixed. I've used Leitz/Leica, VC, Nikkor, Canon, and Sovyetsii RF lenses. Do I really have to eliminate some of my best shots if I'm not 100% sure that the lens speaks, proper German? 2. HCB used a Sonnar on his Leica until he got his Summicron. David Douglas Duncan used LTM Nikkors in Korea. Yet they are often referred to as "Leica photographers." Would we eliminate them as being insufficiently pure? Are we commemorating the Leica company or "The Leica Way" of photographing? I can play either way, but I think we might be missing out on some good pictures if we are too restrictive. --Peter >Very definitely 100% Leica - Digital or analog - Glass and Body., new >technology or film as old as Leica I. I'd consider using both my IIIA and >my M8.2. It might be nice to include a very short biography and photo of >the photographers holding their camera- Most of us might be able to sum up >our life in a few lines.