Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Sun Dec 21 09:34:52 2008
References: <5f1be6b50812210900p2a65d110t99a3b0601940e0bb@mail.gmail.com>

not sad, a joke, David; I'm guessing that Larry was simply trolling for a 
response.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Keenan" <ausdlk@gmail.com>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 12:00 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA


> >BUT IT IS NOT A LEICA.
>
> Jeepers. Times change. Give Leica a break.
>
> Does the latest Nikon D3X bare any resemblance to the first Nikon camera
> (whatever it was)?
>
> I don't hear anyone remotely suggesting that a D3X is not a NIKON.
>
> Or a 5D Mark II isn't a CANON.
>
> The close mindedness of Leica "purists" is really kind of sad.
>
> Dave.
>
> -- 
> 2008 PAW Gallery: www.david-keenan.com/paw
> Web Site: www.david-keenan.com
> Austin Center for Photography: www.visitacp.org -- Check it out!!!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1859 - Release Date: 12/20/2008 
2:34 PM


In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Re: The S2 is not a LEICA)