Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What I find interesting is the name SUMMARIT which was reintroduced with the M lens line last year or the year before and I got the impression it BOMBED and that it turned out that the SUMMARIT name was not a highpoint for nostalgia in historical Leica history but a bit of the opposite a bit of an embarrassment and it was Lee's idea and I thought possibly a reason why he got the pink slip. SUMMARIT is now a name being used in the awesome "I am not worthy" Leica S lens line. A lens line I expect to be second to none in the history of photography for some time to come and then some. For those with tens of thousands of dollars to get themselves into a new system. And can wait that long for a thing like this to maybe happen. It would be much bigger news; a BOMBSHELL if it was for a system which anyone could realistically afford. A new Aircraft Carrier would be great news I'd read about. But not expect to drive one home in near future. Its those airplanes you put on them which really jacks up the cost. mark@rabinergroup.com Mark William Rabiner > From: <grduprey@mchsi.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:18:37 +0000 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable > > > > They are already doing this with their Summarit line of lenses, which the > 28 > Elmarit Asph should also fit into this category. ?The problem they are > having > with this line is that many feel these are compromise lens designs, and not > real leica lenses, although they are, and are actually made by leica in > germany, which you cannot say for the zeiss line of m lenses, but are in > the > same price point. ?From what I have seen and this is also shown by Nathan's > recent postings using his 35 Summarit, is that these are indeed worthy of > the > leica lable.? > > > Gene -------------- Original message from "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu>: > -------------- > > >> Alternatively, the current Leica company could set up its own >> manufacturing >> facilities in a low-cost country, while maintaining current QC standards. >> >> As I see it, Leica may be trying to follow the example the Swiss watch >> industry which has not been price sensitive in the recent past. I do not >> believe this strategy will work. Leica need to find a way to reduce prices >> significantly while retaining quality. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Lawrence Zeitlin" >> To: >> Cc: "Lawrence Zeitlin" >> Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 2:29 PM >> Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable >> >> >>> If Leica couldn't find an overwhelming sympathetic audience in the LUG, >>> it is unlikely to do so in the general camera using population. Leica's >>> plight is similar. on a much smaller scale, to that of the U.S. auto >>> industry. Their best bet might be to ask for a bailout or bridge loan >>> from the German government and, if they can't return to profitability >>> within six months, file for bankruptcy. Their best strategy might be to >>> sell the Leica name, patents, and manufacturing rights to one of the >>> Japanese camera giants. The precedent has been set by Contax, >>> Voightlander, and scores of others. Then perhaps we might have >>> affordable >>> Leica cameras, although a bit plasticky. >>> >>> Larry Z >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information