Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] un-believable
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri Dec 19 17:56:09 2008
References: <C4BF7AB3-DB7F-43A5-9A3A-62AFC042AE67@mac.com> <20081219185359.04b33c1a@linux-019a.site> <0DA7A328-EA7B-486C-935A-38EB0A012C8C@ameritech.net> <BD27E035DFBE447E84496BA54E55A369@D1S9FY41> <494C3CC0.2010707@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191637j16bef191oc3934155177ca856@mail.gmail.com> <494C4109.7060208@gmail.com> <a3f189160812191706r4aac349cu9b43e9681410bbfd@mail.gmail.com> <275326B4-4558-425B-A0E8-3ECC481A6A0F@mac.com>
At 08:24 PM 12/19/2008, you wrote:
>I'll take the fine detail and dynamic range
>over
>the high ISO auto noise reduction
>every time
>George
Me, too! I can handle noise but I can't add detail that's not
there. I've compared M8's to the top of the line Canons and I'll
take an M8 over any of them. I also prefer the simplicity and size
of the rangefinder over those humongous SLRs! I, for one, think
Leica did something right with the M8.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] un-believable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] un-believable)