Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FYI: Black paintM9
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Dec 13 12:49:56 2008
References: <660E24DD87074BD5BB11BA196394132E@xyw> <028b01c95d37$6fd4c7d0$4f7e5770$@net><078EE96237094F16B259AD4AD6B63153@xyw><BLU0-SMTP32D0D749602982DB89DCC08CF60@phx.gbl> <84CFCBB1-3F16-4751-AD9A-14ADDC5DDB55@frozenlight.eu> <4CF9A5A8494C424F8365ABE9BCD070A9@precisionm50> <CAF6D593-81D1-4401-AD9A-52612A5B6D06@frozenlight.eu>

On Dec 13, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Bob,
>
> If I can buy a black lens for my black M for 900 EUR, and a chrome  
> lens (identical condition etc.) for 890 EUR, I will take the latter.
>
> Why am I dismissive of the "look" issue? Because when I show someone  
> a picture, they do not care a hoot whether the lens and body color  
> matched. All they care about is the picture.


and really, for many,  the camera is a vital and practical tool, but a  
tool all the same...does it matter what a hammer looks like?

Steve


>
>
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>
> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>> These things are a matter of opinion, of course, but I don't  
>> understand that
>> attitude. While price and condition are obviously important, and  
>> different
>> people will prioritise different things, I'm surprised that in a  
>> visual
>> medium like photography people would be so dismissive of how their  
>> camera
>> looks - especially where it concerns Leica Ms, which are famously  
>> well
>> designed and good-looking. The pandas lack visual harmony and in my  
>> opinion
>> are ugly. Other things being more or less equal, why would one  
>> choose ugly?
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+leica=web-options.com@leica-users.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Nathan Wajsman
>>> Sent: 13 December 2008 18:40
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] FYI: Black paintM9
>>>
>>> My new M8 will soon be a panda since the 50mm Summilux I
>>> bought for it
>>> is chrome and the M8 is black. What do I care? Nada! Until someone
>>> convinces me that picture quality is affected by this
>>> nonsense, I will
>>> go by condition and price when making my purchase decisions.
>>>
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>
>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from leica at web-options.com (Bob W) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] FYI: Black paintM9)