Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]?Same here, I usually only do a bit of exposure adjust then print or save them. Nathan, I'm a bit surprised the auto iso gave you iso 1250 with so much light, what do you have set as your lowest shutter speed? ?Otherwise the photos are really nice. Gene -------------- Original message from Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com>: -------------- > Likewise. > I've virtually never > sharpened an M8 or DMR > photo > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Dec 11, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Steve Unsworth wrote: > > > I've stopped bothering to sharpen M8 images for web use. I find > > they look > > more natural that way. Dare I say more film like? Of course there are > > exceptions where the original image is a bit on the soft side. > > > > Steve > > > > > > On 11/12/08 22:07, "Nathan Wajsman" wrote: > > > >> Thanks for looking, George. The posted images of course have had some > >> sharpening applied to them, but when I look at the DNG files from the > >> M8 in LR, before I do anything to them, they already have more detail > >> than the E3 files that have already been treated. Let me put it this > >> way: any softness in an M8 image is due to operator error (and > >> yes, of > >> course I had a few of those today); while softness in my E3 or > >> (earlier) Canon images was just as often due to the inherent > >> characteristics of the AF. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information