Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] mon ami bw better...?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon Dec 8 13:30:05 2008
References: <66913A99-4DF1-4115-A934-A17FB1C72F44@cox.net> <9965FD2D-B578-4187-851D-0BAB70450F81@mac.com>

On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Lottermoser George wrote:

> agreed
> all of a sudden
> he became quite serious

so true...
>
>
> Fond regards,
> George
>
> george@imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
>
>> bw is better,  I think?
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/Steve-Barbour-PAW-2006/tikwamtnbw.jpg.html
>>
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] mon ami bw better...?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] mon ami bw better...?)