Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sun Nov 23 14:57:30 2008
References: <4929BE62.5070806@gate.net> <02AAC56E-34E1-4016-A7BC-1A3B65D254CA@telefonica.net>

Ken, there are several considerations.
The EXIF information which is not a priority for you.
Some additional flash functions, which are generally not thought important.
A correction by the firmware of vignetting. This is tailored to specific
focal lengths. Leica recommends that is only significant from the 35 to
wider.
Use with the UV/IR filters. The M8 will allow you to select Lens detection
OFF, ON or ON with UV/IR.
The UV/IR on wides introduces cyan corners which are also corrected by the
firmware, if it knows what lens is fitted, so it is very convenient to have
the 6 BIT coding when you use the recommended UV/IR filters.

In summary, for colour, get the 6 BIT coding for your 35 and wider first. If
you would like the convenience of not changing menu settings with different
lenses, you can get it on the 50 and longer as you want. Its not needed for
vignette correction there, however lens detection ON for un-coded lenses can
cause errors.
The 135 is not codeable because Leica does not recommend it for the M8 due
to the size of the FoV in the M8 finder and associated imprecision in
focussing. Its not impossible to use, I tried it when Tina showed and it
worked perfectly with my M8. 
Regarding the M Coder that Lluis has provided a link for, some people swear
by them and some swear at them. I am of the latter camp. I found the coding
from mine unreliable and frustrating.
If you have non-Leica M lenses, consider John Milich's service to machine
the coding pits into the lens flanges or adaptors. 


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses

Ken,

Look at this, it seems an interesting accessory:

http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/product.asp?P_ID=2013&PT_ID=359

Saludos cordiales
Lluis

El 23/11/2008, a las 21:34, Ken Lassiter escribi?:

> As I begin shopping for my M8.2, I realize that I must have my M 
> lenses barcoded.  I gather that it is required for the best 
> performance of wide lenses such as the 21mm ASPH, 28mm and 35mm 
> Summicrons. What about for longer lenses such as 50mm Summicron and 
> 90mm Elmarit?  Last, what about the Noctilux?  Which lenses are 
> important to have barcoded?  At $175 each, I need to set priorities 
> for which lenses I have coded first and know if it might be a luxury 
> for some others. I see that Tina sometimes uses a 135mm lens on her
> M8 and no barcoding is available for that lens.
> My main concern is optical performance not just recording which lens 
> was used for a particular photo.
>
> All advice offered will be highly appreciated.
>
> Many thanks... Ken Lassiter, Boynton Beach, FL
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from leica at web-options.com (Bob W) ([Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses)
Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses)
In reply to: Message from kenlass at gate.net (Ken Lassiter) ([Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] M8 question #2: Barcoding lenses)