Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Nov 23 13:36:16 2008
References: <20081123114611.312151BF28D@ws1-10.us4.outblaze.com> <969F46E6-7B00-4431-864E-37B860BF60E9@embarqmail.com><4AE8990C-C0EA-4C66-B1FF-6645A842A389@telefonica.net><49298168.9030102@runbox.com> <03402B1A-3D88-4DCE-BD5C-CD5B676F0276@cox.net> <9B4C173E1A764301A715211C9ED9D6B6@dadquad>

On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Steve you really need good contrast to achieve good resolution, the  
> two go
> hand in hand.

to a degree, as you suggest Geoff, you need some contrast to measure  
resolution, but the DR offers a combination of very high resolution  
with very low contrast....

beyond that, I don't believe there is any relationship between the two  
parameters... since I don't know more, I'll leave it to others with  
real expertise in optics to clarify, if they can and wish...

it's my impression that the unusual properties and look of the DR have  
always been attributed to its unique balance of very high resolution  
and low contrast...

but when it comes to physics and optics, I don't know, and I didn't  
sleep in a Holiday Inn last night...


Steve




> The well recognised smooth look that you are describing may be
> partly from moderate contrast, but also from the degree of correction
> present. With more aberration present, the out of focus blurs can  
> retain
> their general shape and be smoother by being more blurred! That is  
> not meant
> to be a criticism of valid personal preference. Of course my taste  
> there is
> probably well established.
>
> Has anyone else noticed that this evolving thread is almost a digest  
> of
> perennial LUG topics?
> Lens coatings,
> Lens cleaning,
> Artistic vs. technical,
> Favourite lenses
> What great master photographers used etc etc
> Now I suppose I have introduced the B word.
>
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?
>
>
> this same argument applies to some of the greatest and highest  
> resolution
> lenses of the past...for example  the Summicron 50/2 DR...low contrast
> combined with very high resolution allows a unique smooth look...and  
> you can
> always increase the contrast if desired...
>
> I am not sure how the coating impacts, or what the coating is for  
> the DR...
>
> this look and behavior likely accounts for this lens being the  
> desert island
> favorite of so many individuals...
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
In reply to: Message from freakscene at weirdness.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Are Leica lenses muliticoated?)