Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun Nov 2 05:17:42 2008
References: <754E60FA7B522D6DA1DAE716@hindolveston.reid.org> <704DE2FFEA684C77BDBA6E3F0F9A54BE@jimnichols> <20081101222146.GE26644@panix.com> <BC7DEA4A-9CD7-4459-84C2-B1F7128F77EE@charter.net> <82c9dd70811020403g216a2501j11b0023a1626df35@mail.gmail.com>

Eric Korenman wrote:

>thanks to all.
>
>I figured it was doppler based, but I would think the pitch would
>INCREASE as the bomb falls toward you.
>I am basing this on the increased pitch of car siren coming toward you.
>OR or as a different concept, a standing wave in an organ pipe as you
>shorten it, the pitch increases.
>
>Could the drop in pitch be related to change in air density through
>which the falling object passes?
>
>Comp sci is computer science. But in the 80's we were programming in
>LISP and Pascal..
>So that is worth 3 cents in today's market.
>My dad used to reminisce about programing by punch cards.
>  
>
Lots of people also may remember voting by punch cards - hope the 
technology and ridicule and ordeal thereafter have been sorted out for good.

About sound - velocity increases up to a point (round 250 km/h for 
dropped  ammunition) hence increased pitch - also the doppler effect, 
but then it has also been said that the one that hurts you you don't 
hear coming ...
phx



>Eric
>
>On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:39 PM, slobodan dimitrov
><s.dimitrov@charter.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>Ah! You must mean something like a "master of science in business".
>>An oxymoron if there ever was one.
>>s.d.
>>
>>On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Rei Shinozuka wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>in grad school my comp sci professor waggishly remarked that any
>>>field of study whose name contained the word "science," was not.
>>>
>>>-rei
>>>
>>>On Nov01 16:56, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Isn't Political Science an oxymoron?
>>>>
>>>>Jim Nichols
>>>>Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Reid"
>>>><reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>>>>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 4:51 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] why do bombs whistle?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>>What is "comp sci"?  I am rather hostile to cutsey phrases like this:
>>>>>> if you want to say something, say it.
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>"Comp sci" is the universal nickname at every US university for
>>>>>Computer Science.
>>>>>Similar to "Poly Sci" for Political Science.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
>>>Ridgewood, New Jersey
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] why do bombs whistle?)