Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, My response was about the Canon 50D not the 5DII. http://www.dpreview.com just reviewed the 50D and in the cons it lists several things it does worse than the 40D including high ISO noise, detail. I know from experience the 40D is a very nice little camera, for a light walk aroound it is great. Now about the 5DII Canon says its sensor is supposed to be better than the 1DsIII....if this is true then it is really good. The files from my 1DsIII blow me away every time I look at them. Lottermoser George wrote: > Any links Harrison? > I'm mildly interested in the 5DII > (mostly because of the video capability) > but also hoping for improved image quality > over my current 5D > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Nov 1, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Harrison McClary wrote: > >> From what I read it is actually worse, more noise and other things. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Harrison McClary Harrison McClary Photography harrison@mcclary.net http://www.mcclary.net ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography http://www.imagestocksouth.com Tobacco Road: Personal Blog: http://www.mcclary.net/blog