Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Scanner Progress......
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed Oct 15 19:10:37 2008
References: <013101c92cee$6d0d3330$47279990$@net> <013c01c92cf4$0bfb7100$23f25300$@net> <a2f8f4470810130011u594c1202ka589e4367e01b1de@mail.gmail.com> <019401c92d3d$cc524b10$64f6e130$@net> <B4204629-97E0-40C7-A4B2-72CE554623F2@btinternet.com>
At 04:34 AM 10/14/2008, you wrote:
>Hi Frank,
>beware of LR2 for scans, it is designed for digital camera files, most
>of my MF scans are too big. It has some file type limitations too. I
>still use photoshop for scans.
>Frank
I've never had a problem using LR with scans, but all of my scans are
35mm. I'd hate to have to go back to using only PS to process
photos. LR saves me hours and hours of processing time.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)