Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: modern pocket watch?
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sun Oct 12 21:29:25 2008

Beats me - I got it for her about 20 years ago and according to the dealer
it needs about $300 of "adjustment" and cleaning every two years or so.  I
got it because she itches when "alloy" bands are on her skin.  No big deal I
guess compared to the original cost.  My little Seiko keeps on working fine,
like my utilitarian Canon or Glock products.  

Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-
> bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Greg Lorenzo
> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2008 10:28 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: RE: [Leica] OT: modern pocket watch?
> 
> 
> > I can't understand who would want a mechanical watch. I spend a> fair
> sum having my wife's Rolex cleaned and calibrated from time> to time.
> 
> I suspect that your wife's Rolex is in fact an automatic unless it was
> made prior to IWC developing the self-winding watch in the early 1950's.
> 
> For an example of a current true mechanical watch see here:
> http://www.alange-soehne.com/en/watches/lange_1.php
> 
> The attraction to a fine time piece is something that either you 'get' or
> you don't.
> 
> Greg Lorenzo
> Calgary, Canada
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of
> your life.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT: modern pocket watch?)
In reply to: Message from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] OT: modern pocket watch?)