Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Or as Walt would put it, a shooter is a shooter even if all he's got is a K1000. BTW, that LX3 I was shooting with this weekend wasn't mine; it belongs at work. I bought it for the job and was test driving it. Still shooting the MP I bought used, and have 1500' of APX 400 in the freezer. $27 per 100' while it lasted. --- On Sun, 9/28/08, Barney Quinn <bjq1@mac.com> wrote: > From: Barney Quinn <bjq1@mac.com> > Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG - Way over my budget... > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008, 9:12 PM > Jan, > > I want to echo and reinforce what others on the list are > saying. I'll > never afford an S2 and I'll never afford a Strad. There > are people > who collect violins. Where they manage to get the money to > do this is > beyond me. There also people who collect cellos. Where they > get the > space to store them I don't know. Here are some of the > things which > determine the value of a stringed instrument. When it was > made. Where > it was made. Who made. Who has owned it, and who has played > it. What > it sounds like is dead last on the list, if it is on the > list at all. > Perhaps this is because to deal with the question of an > instrument's > sound someone has to play it and that is a whole different > question > than talking about how you bought it. It's easy to talk > about > hardware. Learning to use it is a whole different matter. > Talking > about equipment is just human nature. > > Equipment isn't totally irrelevant, but it's far > less important than > many people think. Carter Brey is the Principal Cellist of > the New > York Philaharmonic. He did his audition for the Peabody > Conservatory > on a cello which only cost six or seven hundred dollars. He > got in. > Some years ago I attended a master class with YoYo Ma. At > one point > during the class he wanted to make a point so he borrowed a > cello > from one of the students in the class. I happen to know the > cello in > question. It came from a local dealer and cost about twenty > five > hundred dollars. It was a cheap cello, although there is > nothing > cheap about a cheap cello. He sounded every but as good on > this > student cello as he did on his Strad. Point is this. At > some point it > isn't about what you've got it's about what you > do with it. > > Barney > > > On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Jan Decher wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > I am getting rather overwhelmed by the volume of this > list and feel > > a little bit out of place here. I will definitely not > be able to > > afford an M8 (or DMR, or S2 for that matter) for the > forseeable > > future and have a much more analog low-budget approach > to shooting > > and owing Leica gear than (it seems) most here. > > Will can fully satisfy the digital needs (mosty for my > work as a > > zoologist) with a lowly Canon Rebel Xsi, D50 or G10, > but love the > > feel and timeless image quality of a IIIf, M3, M6 or > SL2 and the > > smell of my B&W darkroom (with B22XL enlarger). > > Is there a Leica list for analog only, classic Leica > users, where > > the newest gear is not necessarily the best? > > Thanks, Jan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for > more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information