Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: camera shake was: Re: [Leica] a serious question
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Sep 26 07:47:36 2008

Kyle Cassidy <kcassidy@asc.upenn.edu> wrote:

> is that not though the very nature of what IS lenses do? focus on the
scene and hold 
> it steady, ostensibly i guess, by picking points in the scene and moving
the image (or 
> the sensor) so that those points are always hitting the same place on the
ccd during 
> the length of the exposure?

Optical stabilization such as Canon IS and Nikon VR shift elements in the
lens in response to signals from gyroscopic sensors in order to move the
image counter to the camera's movements.  They do not move the camera's
sensor.

The advantages have been well-described.  Disadvantages include the lag to
bring the gyroscopes up to speed, additional power consumption, adding
several air/glass surfaces to the optical system, and the off-center
optical effects from the shifted elements.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE ? Free email based on Microsoft? Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE