Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Peter Dzwig wrote: > Tina, > > FWIW I think that the photos have a timeless quality -or rather they > are > actually of a time of which all traces have presumably dissappeared. > I think > that you should concentrate on scanning as many as you can and then > spot those > that you really want to. They form a historical document in their > own right and > completing the document is the most important thing. The marks are > afterall in > themselves an indication of the way you were obliged to work and so > a record of > sorts in their own right. some are quite beautiful and as Peter says, have a timeless quality like more ancient civilizations ..... that must be saved if only by the documentation (like your images) that lives on... I would do some resoration (ie spotting etc) but not be manic about it... then I'd consider a book...there may be interest, they are beautiful, Steve > > > Peter Dzwig > > Tina Manley wrote: >> At 11:09 AM 9/17/2008, you wrote: >> >> >>> let's see a representative example or two of the untouched >>> kind...Steve >> >> From an earlier e-mail: >> >> Here is one complete with dust and scratches: >> >> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/103258472 >> >> Here is a crop of the upper right corner: >> >> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/103258474 >> >> Now you see why I'm going blind and have to take a break! It is >> authentic dust from Iran but maybe a little too much :-D >> >> Tina >> >> Tina Manley >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information